The following is a post by Or Tuttnauer, based on a thread on Twitter. I asked Or if I could turn it into a F&V post, and he kindly agreed.
_________
In Israel, Yair Lapid (Yesh Atid) and Naftali Bennett (Yamina) are trying now to form a cabinet, with Bennett the first prime minister in a rotation between the two. One problem (among others) – Bennett’s party commands only 6% of the parliament. Critics say he will lose even that at next election if he takes a turn as PM. Will he?
I looked at http://Parlgov.org data of 474 PM-parties in 29 countries over 70 years (1945-2015) and how they fared in the next elections.

As the scatter plot shows, the vast majority of these parties lose votes in subsequent elections. Governing has its costs. But most PM parties are much larger than Bennett’s.
To figure out how change in vote share depends on vote share, I ran a regression with the former as DV, and the latter as well as its square value to allow for non-linearity. Turns out most parties lose votes, but not the small ones – below 30%. These are parties smaller than the average or median PM-party in the data (37% and 36%, respectively). For these smaller ruling party, the predicted gain or loss is indistinguishable from zero. Compared to the fortunes of the larger ruling parties, not losing, and not gaining votes is good news. Lucky for Bennett!

But wait! what about ideology? Bennett’s party is also far from the centre, isn’t that a precarious position for a ruling party? Well, if we add an interaction with extremity, we see that at the very low end, extreme parties of up to 15% vote share seem to actually gain votes. This is intriguing. Perhaps (as suggested to me by Matthew Shugart), these extreme parties gain credibility after heading a government and are therefore perceived in the next elections as more moderate or mainstream than their ideology would otherwise suggest, leading to a wider electoral support. However, it may also be that there are too few cases in this range to make a meaningful inference.

So, should Bennett risk it and be PM? I say yes. First, if you follow Israeli politics, you know this is better than the alternative (if you don’t, trust me). Also, you don’t get many chances to become PM. And political narratives – like history – are written by the winner.
Appendix
Below is the list of past cases of small PM parties, their extremity, and their vote share change at the next election.
Country | Party | Cabinet start date | Cabinet name | Extremity | vote share (t) | Vote share change |
BEL | PVVVLD | 12-Jul-99 | Verhofstadt I | 2.0053 | 14.3 | 1.06 |
NOR | KrF | 17-Oct-97 | Bondevik I | 0.8516 | 13.7 | -1.2 |
SVN | NSI | 16-May-90 | Peterle | 2.9345 | 13 | 1.51 |
ISL | A | 28-Jun-59 | Jonsson II | 0.5556 | 12.5 | 2.7 |
NOR | KrF | 19-Oct-01 | Bondevik II | 0.8516 | 12.5 | -5.7 |
DNK | V | 19-Dec-73 | Hartling | 2.292 | 12.3 | 11 |
BEL | PVVVLD | 10-Jun-07 | Verhofstadt III | 2.0053 | 11.83 | -3.19 |
FRA | RPR | 20-Mar-86 | Chirac II | 2.4997 | 11.5 | 7.7 |
ITA | PSI | 4-Aug-83 | Craxi I | 1.2278 | 11.4 | 2.9 |
BEL | CVP | 13-Jun-10 | Leterme III | 0.7667 | 10.85 | 0.76 |
NOR | Sp | 12-Oct-65 | Borten I | 0.3435 | 9.8 | -0.8 |
NOR | Sp | 7-Sep-69 | Borten II | 0.3435 | 9 | 2.03 |
POL | PC | 23-Dec-91 | Olszewski | 0.5556 | 8.7 | -4.28 |
NLD | ARP | 7-Jun-71 | Biesheuvel I | 0.8067 | 8.59 | 0.25 |
FIN | RKP-SFP | 5-May-54 | Torngren | 1.3906 | 6.8 | -0.3 |
Well, I guess it is now “academic.”
LikeLike
It seems it is back on!
LikeLike
Pingback: Israel government update and the likelihood of a 2021b election | Fruits and Votes
Pingback: Israel government 2021 | Fruits and Votes
Pingback: Israel 2022 | Fruits and Votes