Reconsidering presidential powers

Robert Elgie commented, at another thread:

I think we already have plenty of ways of distinguishing between stronger and weaker presidents – the Shugart and Carey scores and the Siaroff presidential power scores being foremost among them. For example, we could agree to call presidents who score below a certain threshold heads of state. However, what we really need is a more dynamic set of such scores. Alan’s ((I assume Robert means Alan Siaroff.)) index is really useful here because it tries to capture ‘actual’ and not just constitutional powers. So, what we need is not just a score for France since 1963, but France’s presidential power score from 1981-86, 1986-88, etc. Is Hollande as powerful as Sarkozy using this measure? In other words, we need scores to capture such changes and to be updated regularly. Let’s argue over whether France is a 5 or a 6 under Sarkozy on Alan’s measure rather than whether France is premier-presidential or something else. If we had reliable time series scores that captured changes in actual presidential power, then we could test more systematically to see whether presidential power really made a difference to particular outcomes.

My only comment (for now) is that I largely gave up trying to measure presidential powers some years ago. The Shugart and Carey (1992) index has some methodological issues ((which is not to say it is not useful regardless!)) but at least it was an attempt to base powers on constitutional provisions. It is even more challenging to measure powers dynamically, across presidents or even within terms of individual presidents. My last foray into that was in Mainwaring and Shugart (1997), in which we made the distinction between “constitutional” and “partisan” powers.

Why I still prefer the typology of presidential, president-parliamentary, and premier-presidential is that it creates categories that are definable without observation of behavior, ((And, in principle, readily determined from formal rules, although there are of course cases that defy easy coding.)) as well as mutually exclusive. Then it is a matter of exploring contextual variables that affect how these types operate in practice.

Clearly, however, it is on an open research agenda.

3 thoughts on “Reconsidering presidential powers

  1. Thanks for starting a thread. Just to clarify, I think that a regime type variable – presidentialism, president-parliamentarism etc – and a presidential power variable are complementary not mutually exclusive. We know that regime type variables help to explain broad outcomes like democratisation, the organisation of political parties, etc. Presidential power might capture something different, such as agenda-setting power, helping to explain more specific outcomes, perhaps certain policies. It might also help to capture outcome variation within given regime types e.g. premier-presidentialism. So, if we were to have a regularly updated index of presidential power (I was thinking of Alan’s EJPR measure because it is trying to capture more than just the constitutional situation), then we could test to see whether such intuitions were correct. One problem is that current measures record a fixed score. France = 5 etc. What we would really like to know, I think, is France’s score since 1963. It might be 5 for long periods, but it must have varied during cohabitation at least. It would be nice to have a measure that captured such variations and for lots of countries over time.

  2. I agree on the value. I just have problems with measuring powers dynamically.

    I also now realize that when you said Alan, you meant Siaroff.

    It has been a long time since I looked at the literature on presidential powers (around 2006), and I am not likely to get back to it given my current agenda.

  3. > “I also now realize that when you said Alan, you meant Siaroff”

    Yeah, not moi. But an easy mistake to make. Most Australians adopt the name “Alan” after passing the Trials of Fire required to earn the franchise at the age of 17. It was either that or “Bruce”.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s