Conservatives have good reason to oppose AV

A column in The Independent by John Curtice (Professor of Politics at Strathclyde) suggests that the UK Conservative Party has good reason to oppose the adoption of the Alternative Vote (AV). At every election in the past three decades, save one, the Conservatives would have won fewer seats under AV than they did under First Past the Post (FPTP). The conclusion is based on analysis of polls from these past elections that asked voters who their second choice would have been.

While the Liberal Democrats would have gained seats in most elections, they would not have gained enough in any election to result in neither big party holding a majority in parliament. Only 2010 would have been a no-majority situation, just as it was under FPTP in the election that produced the current Conservative-LibDem coalition.

While the government is going ahead with the referendum on AV for May of this year, as part of its coalition agreement, the two parties are opposing each other on the referendum question.

There is, of course, always the chance that changed voting patterns resulting from the very existence of the coalition itself could make Conservatives a beneficiary of AV in future elections–a possibility not addressed by Curtice’s study. There have been indications recently that at least some Conservatives were warming to AV. Yet based on past experience, Conservatives and AV do not mix.

Curtice’s columns provides some breakdowns of the voting patterns and likely effect at each of the elections analyzed.

There is also a companion article in The Independent on this theme.

One thought on “Conservatives have good reason to oppose AV

  1. The usual caveats against applying past electoral results to a different electoral system apply, since the electoral system itself affects how the politicians campaign.

    But the Curtice article is useful in reminding people that AV is not proportional representation, and since single seat electorates are retained, will likely continue to produce disproportionate parliaments.

    He should have said more about the stupidity of taking a position on an electoral system on the basis of whether it will help or hurt your favored party at the very next election.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s