Can’t get no respect

There will be no Respect in the new House of Commons.

The Respect-Unity Coalition, founded by high-profile Labour defector George Galloway in advance of the 2005 election, failed to win either of the two adjoining East London constituencies that were its best shot.

In Bethnal Green & Bow, Galloway rode opposition in the Muslim community to the Iraq war (as well as working class resentment over New Labour) to victory in 2005. He stood by his promise not to seek reelection to the seat, standing aside for a local, Abjol Miah.

Instead, Galloway ran in Poplar & Limehouse.

In both of these constituencies, Respect came in third in this election. The results give us a hint at the lower salience of the Iraq issue as well as Galloway’s own personal vote. Without Galloway, Respect fell from 36.6% in 2005 to 16.8% in 2010 in Bethnal Green & Bow. Yet that Galloway-less 2010 percentage is close to what Galloway himself won in Poplar & Limehouse this time: 17.5%. Even that was a decline, albeit a very small one, on what the Respect candidate (Oliur Rahman) had in 2005: 18.1%. So Galloway bequeathed less than half his support to his party successor, suggesting the party was utterly dependent on the “personal vote” of its leader. Yet his unimpressive performance in his new district might lead one to conclude that, with the reduced salience of the Iraq issue, the party’s “natural” support simply is in the 17-18% range, even with its outspoken leader. (No one ever claimed that disentangling party and personal voting was straightforward!)

Meanwhile, in Barking, BNP leader Nick Griffin came in third (14.6%) and Labour won a stronger majority of the vote than in 2005.

3 thoughts on “Can’t get no respect

  1. “Barking”… no comment, other than “London 11th District” wouldn’t have the same resonance.

  2. In other good news,Barking evidently isn’t :All 12 BNP councillors lost their seats.

    The resulting council,comprised entirely of Labour members,illustrates 2 of the commonest issues raised in FPTP V PR discussions. The former results in an unrepresentative council with no opposition.The latter would bring back the BNP.

    Since PR would also give Conservatives and Lib Dems a chance of representation in Barking I’d sooner take that chance.

    Clegg could do worse than settle for PR in all UK local elections if,as I suspect,there is no realistic chance of getting it from either Brown or Cameron nationally.

  3. BNP generally performed relatively well in constituencies where it stood (around 3-4%) despite its failure to perform well – or as well as had been feared – in Barking. By contrast the Greens did badly (1-2%) in all but a few places where they ran having ‘bet the farm’ on Brighton Pavilion, which they did win (There were dozens of Greens leafleting and they were leafleting and canvasssing in central Brighton everywhere for days on end).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.